Monday, 30 March 2015
Tuesday, 24 February 2015
"MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS AND TERRORISTS ARE NOT MUSLIMS."
In
the HISTORY of the world, who has KILLED maximum INNOCENT
human beings
1) "Hitler"
Do you know who he was
He was a Christian, but media will never call Christians terrorists.
2) "Joseph Stalin called as Uncle Joe".
He has killed 20 million human beings including 14.5 million were starved to death.
Was he a Muslim
3) "Mao Tse Tsung (China)"
He has killed 14 to 20 million human beings.
Was he a Muslim
4) "Benito Mussolini (Italy)"
He has killed 400 thousand human beings.
Was he a Muslim
5) "Ashoka" In Kalinga Battle
He has killed 100 thousand human beings.
Was he a Muslim
6) Embargo put by George Bush in Iraq,
1/2 million children
has been killed in Iraq alone!!! Imagine these people are never called terrorists by the media.
Why
Today the majority of the non-muslims are afraid by hearing the words "JIHAD".
Jihad is an Arabic word which comes from root Arabic word "JAHADA" which means "TO STRIVE" or "TO STRUGGLE" against evil and for justice. It does not
mean killing innocents.
The difference is we stand against evil, not with evil".
You still think that ISLAM is the problem
1. The First World War, 17 million dead
(caused by non-Muslim).
2. The Second World War, 50-55 million dead (caused by non-Muslim).
3. Nagasaki atomic bombs 200000 dead
(caused by non-Muslim).
4. The War in Vietnam, over 5 million dead (caused by non-Muslim).
5. The War in Bosnia/Kosovo, over 5,00,000 dead (caused by non-Muslim).
6. The War in Iraq (so far) 12,000,000 deaths
(caused by non-Muslim).
7. Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, Burma etc (caused by non-Muslim).
8. In Cambodia 1975-1979, almost 3 million deaths (caused by non-Muslim).
"MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS
AND
TERRORISTS ARE NOT MUSLIMS."
Please remove first double standards on Killings.
human beings
1) "Hitler"
Do you know who he was
He was a Christian, but media will never call Christians terrorists.
2) "Joseph Stalin called as Uncle Joe".
He has killed 20 million human beings including 14.5 million were starved to death.
Was he a Muslim
3) "Mao Tse Tsung (China)"
He has killed 14 to 20 million human beings.
Was he a Muslim
4) "Benito Mussolini (Italy)"
He has killed 400 thousand human beings.
Was he a Muslim
5) "Ashoka" In Kalinga Battle
He has killed 100 thousand human beings.
Was he a Muslim
6) Embargo put by George Bush in Iraq,
1/2 million children
has been killed in Iraq alone!!! Imagine these people are never called terrorists by the media.
Why
Today the majority of the non-muslims are afraid by hearing the words "JIHAD".
Jihad is an Arabic word which comes from root Arabic word "JAHADA" which means "TO STRIVE" or "TO STRUGGLE" against evil and for justice. It does not
mean killing innocents.
The difference is we stand against evil, not with evil".
You still think that ISLAM is the problem
1. The First World War, 17 million dead
(caused by non-Muslim).
2. The Second World War, 50-55 million dead (caused by non-Muslim).
3. Nagasaki atomic bombs 200000 dead
(caused by non-Muslim).
4. The War in Vietnam, over 5 million dead (caused by non-Muslim).
5. The War in Bosnia/Kosovo, over 5,00,000 dead (caused by non-Muslim).
6. The War in Iraq (so far) 12,000,000 deaths
(caused by non-Muslim).
7. Afghanistan, Iraq, Palestine, Burma etc (caused by non-Muslim).
8. In Cambodia 1975-1979, almost 3 million deaths (caused by non-Muslim).
"MUSLIMS ARE NOT TERRORISTS
AND
TERRORISTS ARE NOT MUSLIMS."
Please remove first double standards on Killings.
Wednesday, 14 January 2015
Why a Training Needs Assessment is Important
“When solving
problems, dig at the roots instead of just hacking at the leaves.” Anthony J.
D’Angelo
Training is not a panacea. Yet training is frequently
treated like the kitchen drawer that accumulates all of the miscellaneous items
that no one wants to take the time to sort through and put away properly. There
seems to be the notion that, when in doubt, schedule a training session.
However, there are many things wrong with this approach to
training. It is important to take the time to investigate the reason for the
training request. If we don’t, we run the risk of training the wrong people in
the wrong content at the wrong time. This is not only a waste of time, energy
and money for us and for others, it also guarantees that training in general
and training professionals in specific will be considered irrelevant and
unimportant.
A training needs assessment is the only way to verify and
validate the need, focus, scope and target group for a training program.
Training needs assessments can be proactive or reactive. In
both cases, the goal of the training needs assessment is to identify
performance issues that can be remedied through the introduction, practice, or
reinforcement of specific and measurable knowledge and/or skill sets.
Proactive training needs assessments initiate a strategic
review of future organizational needs that will require new capabilities and
competencies. These assessments tend to be more formal and systematized in
order to determine the full spectrum of possible training needs throughout the
organization. They may involve assessment strategies that are time consuming
and require specialized expertise, such as on-line surveys, focus groups, and
knowledge tests.
Reactive training needs assessments respond to requests to
train pre-identified employees in specific content. These assessments tend to
be more informal in order to get a better idea of the reason for the training
request and what the training is intended to achieve. They typically involve
assessment strategies that are relatively quick and require basic skills to
conduct one-on-one interviews with supervisors and/or employees, or review
performance data.
Regardless of whether or not the training needs assessment
is proactive or reactive, it should determine that:
1. There is a
verified performance issue that can be remedied through training.
Does the performance issue involve skills that can be
taught? If so, then training is the answer. If the issue involves notification
of new or changed policy, then a memo or a brief meeting may be the better
recourse. If the issue is individual employee performance, then performance
management will be the best approach.
2. This issue is
important enough that it needs to be addressed.
How critical will the consequences be to the organization if
the training does not occur? The relative importance of addressing this
performance issue needs to be considered. Most organizations will have many
different training needs, so some prioritization has to occur
3. The appropriate
target audience has been identified.
What is the root cause of the performance issue and who is
ultimately responsible? If employees are not performing satisfactorily, the
typical assumption is that they lack certain knowledge or skills that can be
taught. This may not be the case. Instead, their poor performance may actually
be due to a lack of delegation, communication or planning skills of their
supervisors or managers. In this event, the appropriate target audience would
be the supervisors or managers, not the employees.
4. The appropriate
training content has been identified.
What knowledge, skills and/or behavior need to be learned?
Once the root cause of the performance issue has been located and the correct
target audience has been identified, the training content can then be
specified. The content will be based on the knowledge and skills gap between
current and desired performance.
5. The desired
training results are realistic.
Can the desired learning be accomplished within the allotted
time frame? Expectations regarding the outcome of a training program may need
to be managed. Training can only build skills incrementally. If there is a
major skills gap that needs to be addressed, then this may require more than
one training session.
6. The training
approach is cost-effective.
What is the most cost-effective way to build the necessary
skills? It is reasonable and cost effective to schedule a training program if
new skills need to be developed or existing skills need to be refreshed and
updated for a number of employees. However, scheduling an entire training
program to address isolated individual performance issues is neither
appropriate nor cost-effective. It may make more sense to send the individual
employee to a public workshop, provide on-the-job training and coaching, or use
an e-learning solution.
7. The training
schedule is compatible with work schedules.
What are the limitations imposed by the target group’s work
schedules? If the target group works different shifts, that will need to be
considered when scheduling the training program. Also, there may be times of
the week or the season when work responsibilities prohibit attendance at a
training program.
Take the time to investigate training requests. Training
needs assessments will help you avoid wasting yours and others’ time and money,
impugning training as a viable performance support, and harming your
credibility as a training professional.
Courtesy Laurel and
Associates, Ltd.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)